The final week of field camp consisted of a swap between geology/geophysics students, preparation of final reports, and a final presentation.
For the first day (Monday) of the geology/geophysics swap I was helping the geologists with my homebrew resistivity rig. After some small problems in the morning the device cooperated, and we took a like across a fault, seeing massive jumps in conductivity over the gouge area. The second day I was actually out with the geology professors hand mapping some of the surface geology in the area. Tom and Neil were very instructive and were able to measure a strike and dip on things that very few would term 'outcrop'. Nonetheless the data plotted nicely!
After the mapping came independent projects and final reports. Cullen and I decided to collect a gravity line across the dry union fault near Salida (the area of the first field trip). I ended up staying at camp to help the geologists process their data and Cullen went with Guang to collect the line. The results were stunning and the calculated fault dip angle is 87 degrees.
Processing the magnetic data was quite a challenge. To take the data we place flags along the path we walk, take their coordinates and press mark at each flag. The instrument is collecting a magnetic reading every 1/10 of a second. I ended up writing code that assumes a constant walking place between flags and linearly interpolates positions between. The code then re-writes a new datafile that can be plotted by OASIS. The quick code hack was not perfect and really should have already been in the software that came with the instrument. Hopefully over the summer I'll have time to perfect the code and write a nice GUI to go along with it. (Error checking would also be nice)
Finally on the last day of camp we had to give a presentation of the results. Cullen and I talked for about 40 minutes and then there was much discussion between the faculty of our image. We had everybody excited about what we should try next year! Unless plans change it is likely that Cullen and I will TA next year.
Now I'm at NASA in Houston, TX. Towards the end of this week I'll start a weekly post about the work here. It's very exciting work with a flying vehicle and guidance software. Stay Tuned! Below are a few pictures from the group trip to Pike's Peak. A copy of the final report can also be downloaded HERE.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Week 2 (Seismic Week) - Field Camp 4
This week was seismic week for us here in Canon City. We carefully selected a site that crosses from sediment into basement, but the nature of the contact is unknown. It ran across the property of a nice couple who moved here from Iowa three years ago. They are interested in the geology and were more than happy to have us tramp all over with magnetic, gravity, and finally seismic gear including a larger thumper mounted on an ATV.
The first part of the week involved Cullen and I working on a mounting system to attach the thumper for the four-wheeler. Seismic surveying works on the premise that different rocks have different wave velocities as a function of the type of rock, fluid content, etc. We set out a long line of geophones (basically a vertical seismometer) and then hit the ground very hard to induce a signal. From the return of the signal we can learn a lot about what the subsurface looks like.
For some surveys we hit the ground with a sledgehammer, shoot it with a gun, or even use dynamite! In this case we tried a new device that pulls a 40kg weight up with an electric motor and then drops it. There is also a giant rubberband that accelerates the weight towards the ground. There is currently a battle going on between naming the machine the seismic thumper device or the seismic thumper and utility device. We added weights, battery mounts, and even a flashing safety light to the four-wheeler.
Before we could even use the thumper the control box failed due to a cable issue, so I had to rewire the control system (actually just a solenoid control) and mount the switch in a box on the ATV. It was a midnight patch up, but it worked well all day!
The survey was laid out on Wednesday. The line was almost 750m long, then we even rolled it forward! Geophones were placed every 10m and the thumper was shot at each geophone three times to 'stack' the data (this helps us reduce random noise). We don't have any images yet, but tomorrow we begin processing. The line took a day to layout, a day to shoot, and tomorrow morning to roll up. Several long days for us here. I also put together a quick video of the thumper shooting.
On a side note, we also took a great hike and field trip in the past week, so I've added a few photos of the Collegiate Peaks, and Tunnel Drive Trail.
The first part of the week involved Cullen and I working on a mounting system to attach the thumper for the four-wheeler. Seismic surveying works on the premise that different rocks have different wave velocities as a function of the type of rock, fluid content, etc. We set out a long line of geophones (basically a vertical seismometer) and then hit the ground very hard to induce a signal. From the return of the signal we can learn a lot about what the subsurface looks like.
For some surveys we hit the ground with a sledgehammer, shoot it with a gun, or even use dynamite! In this case we tried a new device that pulls a 40kg weight up with an electric motor and then drops it. There is also a giant rubberband that accelerates the weight towards the ground. There is currently a battle going on between naming the machine the seismic thumper device or the seismic thumper and utility device. We added weights, battery mounts, and even a flashing safety light to the four-wheeler.
Before we could even use the thumper the control box failed due to a cable issue, so I had to rewire the control system (actually just a solenoid control) and mount the switch in a box on the ATV. It was a midnight patch up, but it worked well all day!
The survey was laid out on Wednesday. The line was almost 750m long, then we even rolled it forward! Geophones were placed every 10m and the thumper was shot at each geophone three times to 'stack' the data (this helps us reduce random noise). We don't have any images yet, but tomorrow we begin processing. The line took a day to layout, a day to shoot, and tomorrow morning to roll up. Several long days for us here. I also put together a quick video of the thumper shooting.
On a side note, we also took a great hike and field trip in the past week, so I've added a few photos of the Collegiate Peaks, and Tunnel Drive Trail.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Week 1 - Field Camp 3
Week 1 has been very busy and week 2 is almost to begin. We were lucky with the weather, but this week looks to begin the inevitable warm up that we all knew would come. This week the geophysics group went on a field trip to get the regional setting (Monday), learned detailed surveying with the TOPCON differential GPS (Tuesday), conducted a gravity survey, and a magnetic survey (days dependent on group assignment). The week ended on Saturday with another field trip out west to see some different formations.
The regional field trip went well and we scrambled across some slopes to see most of the section that the geologists would be mapping and be very familiar with. As a geophysics student I was more interested in the rock properties, what methods we could differentiate them with, etc. This trip did help put things in a big picture geologic perspective though.
The differential GPS surveying went well despite a few equipment setup issues, which were to be expected with new users. The basic premise of the system is to leave a very precise GPS unit in place all day while another identical unit is used as a rover. The two data sets can then be merged using the base to correct for signal attenuation by the continually changing atmosphere and other error sources. In general sub-centimeter accuracy is achievable. This accuracy in elevation is especially important in gravity data processing since 1m makes .3086 mGal difference in the data. While some complain that taking 2 minutes to get a GPS fix is unreasonable I remind you that we are getting a very accurate position on an irregularly shaped rotating planet FROM SPACE... it's amazing it dosen't take longer.
The gravity survey looks at density differences in the subsurface while the magnetic survey examines differences in magnetic susceptibility. We are interested in contracts between sediments and basement or with a dike especially in this area. After the processing I will post some results, but I know the magnetometer went crazy when I passed over the suspected location of a large dike. The gravity survey should also be helpful, but the gravimeter does instill a certain amount of fear in everyone since it is ~$100,000 and VERY easy to break. Omar is modeling the magnetometer in this picture.
Finally, we went on another trip Saturday which involved me getting some nice rocks with chlorite in them for bookends from a tailings type pile in a field. This week will be seismic week, so stay tuned for updates and pictures of our new (hopefully) 700m long seismic line!
The regional field trip went well and we scrambled across some slopes to see most of the section that the geologists would be mapping and be very familiar with. As a geophysics student I was more interested in the rock properties, what methods we could differentiate them with, etc. This trip did help put things in a big picture geologic perspective though.
The differential GPS surveying went well despite a few equipment setup issues, which were to be expected with new users. The basic premise of the system is to leave a very precise GPS unit in place all day while another identical unit is used as a rover. The two data sets can then be merged using the base to correct for signal attenuation by the continually changing atmosphere and other error sources. In general sub-centimeter accuracy is achievable. This accuracy in elevation is especially important in gravity data processing since 1m makes .3086 mGal difference in the data. While some complain that taking 2 minutes to get a GPS fix is unreasonable I remind you that we are getting a very accurate position on an irregularly shaped rotating planet FROM SPACE... it's amazing it dosen't take longer.
The gravity survey looks at density differences in the subsurface while the magnetic survey examines differences in magnetic susceptibility. We are interested in contracts between sediments and basement or with a dike especially in this area. After the processing I will post some results, but I know the magnetometer went crazy when I passed over the suspected location of a large dike. The gravity survey should also be helpful, but the gravimeter does instill a certain amount of fear in everyone since it is ~$100,000 and VERY easy to break. Omar is modeling the magnetometer in this picture.
Finally, we went on another trip Saturday which involved me getting some nice rocks with chlorite in them for bookends from a tailings type pile in a field. This week will be seismic week, so stay tuned for updates and pictures of our new (hopefully) 700m long seismic line!
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Setting Up Equipment - Field Camp 2
The past few days have been working to get a solid radio link to downtown. The internet signal comes up on a 5.8GHz link, is distributed over a 5.12GHz mesh around the camp, and is repeated to others on a 3GHz haul over the canyon. Below is a picture of the stack at the top of the camp on the study hall. The repeaters are mounted on the sides of cabins. The current link is slow, but a new circuit will be installed downtown giving us a fast connection this week. Also included is a picture of the geophysics server (named thor) and the associated gear.
We also worked on setting up the thumper. This is a machine that attaches to a trailer hitch of any vehicle (truck, ATV, etc) and impacts the ground with a great force. We use this in seismic imaging. Normally we use a sledgehammer for small surveys, but that can get tiring. For large, deep surveys explosives are used, this machine is a great middle ground.
As you can see there is still some work to be done. Tomorrow the hitch will be modified and in the evening I'll be building some custom brackets and mounts for the controls and battery with Dr. Keranen. We'll use aluminium angle iron to build most of the mounts, pictures will follow.
Tomorrow we all leave early for a regional trip to get the general geological/tectonic setting of the area. This trip will be both geologists and geophysicists.
We also worked on setting up the thumper. This is a machine that attaches to a trailer hitch of any vehicle (truck, ATV, etc) and impacts the ground with a great force. We use this in seismic imaging. Normally we use a sledgehammer for small surveys, but that can get tiring. For large, deep surveys explosives are used, this machine is a great middle ground.
As you can see there is still some work to be done. Tomorrow the hitch will be modified and in the evening I'll be building some custom brackets and mounts for the controls and battery with Dr. Keranen. We'll use aluminium angle iron to build most of the mounts, pictures will follow.
Tomorrow we all leave early for a regional trip to get the general geological/tectonic setting of the area. This trip will be both geologists and geophysicists.
Friday, May 20, 2011
Setting Up Camp - Field Camp 1
This is the first in a series of posts I'll be writing about my experience at the new Bartell field camp. This camp will serve as the base for summer geology/geophysics students. Geologists will be here 5 weeks, geophysicists 3 weeks. I arrived early to setup computer equipment and help get things going around the place.

I arrived Wednesday and unloaded the server, 10 laptops, associated wiring/network components, and my field gear. More on the setup in the next post when we have internet and the rest of the network up and running.
The first night here the freshman field trip was also at camp, spending the night before departing to Dalhart, TX. We all hooked up the projector, hung a sheet, and had a movie night in the dining hall (complete with popcorn). The movie was 2012, one of the better geological comedies if you ask anybody there.
The camp site is beautiful and my cabin is at the top, affording the best view. This view comes at the price of walking a VERY steep trail, and at 6,200 ft. it's easy to get a bit winded. After a couple days it is not a problem though.

So far the weather has been very cool and rainy in town, but fairly dry up at camp. It's hit freezing at night making a sleeping bag necessary in the cabins. The peaks off in the distance are still snow covered, but today were obscured by rain shafts.

Stay tuned for a tech update tomorrow and then the arrival of the rest of the crew on Sunday. The next few weeks should brings lots of interesting field work and interesting results.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

I arrived Wednesday and unloaded the server, 10 laptops, associated wiring/network components, and my field gear. More on the setup in the next post when we have internet and the rest of the network up and running.
The first night here the freshman field trip was also at camp, spending the night before departing to Dalhart, TX. We all hooked up the projector, hung a sheet, and had a movie night in the dining hall (complete with popcorn). The movie was 2012, one of the better geological comedies if you ask anybody there.
The camp site is beautiful and my cabin is at the top, affording the best view. This view comes at the price of walking a VERY steep trail, and at 6,200 ft. it's easy to get a bit winded. After a couple days it is not a problem though.

So far the weather has been very cool and rainy in town, but fairly dry up at camp. It's hit freezing at night making a sleeping bag necessary in the cabins. The peaks off in the distance are still snow covered, but today were obscured by rain shafts.

Stay tuned for a tech update tomorrow and then the arrival of the rest of the crew on Sunday. The next few weeks should brings lots of interesting field work and interesting results.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Surviving a Crash - The Black Box Then and Now
After an airliner crashes there is a search for survivors (of which you have about a 1:100 chance of being among) and the search for the ever important in infamous 'black box'. The black box records critical flight data that helps accident investigators determine what caused the crash and if there are problems with the airplane model that need to be corrected. This was the case of the stripping jack screw in the tail of the MD-83 that caused the crash of Alaska Air 261 in 2000. The black box has undergone many transformations over the years, but it has always had to be a durable machine that can preserve data through the dramatic forces of a crash, water immersion, and inferno like fires of jet fuel and airframe materials.
Some of the earliest flight data recorders used photographic film rolls that had lines exposed on them by light reflected of sets of mirrors. The mirrors were deflected different amounts according to aircraft parameters resulting in a 'strip chart' on the film. This was easy to develop, but was only a one time use as the film had to be replaced after exposure. The first data recorders just recorded a few simple channels of data and were common only on test flights due to their cost.
Later black boxes, like the one featured in the video below, used metal strips with the data scratched into the metal by a sharp stylus. These records survived the fire and shock much better than film, but were still single use. Keep in mind this is still all done with 'old fashioned' technology as there was no solid state memory in these days. The next step was voice recording. What were the pilots talking about before the crash?
Video on Analog Recorder
In the 1950's spy gadgets were the rage in the intelligence community and they required some of the same properties that aircraft flight data recorder designers desired: compact, durable, simple. Wire recording was the answer. Magnetically encode data on a spool of wire and use a ground based playback/decoding system. It wasn't long before both the flight data and the cockpit voice data were being recorded on the same wire reel. This reel could be erased and used again.
Modern flight data recorders and required to store at least 88 parameters by law (US) and they are solid state. There are a few cases where the data has been unreadable to due destruction of the unit, but new units that propel themselves from the crash may solve that problem. The new recorders also transmit a beacon signal making them easier to find for about a month. Some of the smart units are even capable of observing when inputs are changing rapidly and collecting data more often as this is when things are likely to go wrong.
The purpose of this trip through the history of the flight data recorder was not only to show the evolution of a remarkable and very useful device, but to show how engineering problems can be solved without a microchip. Are the recorders now better than those of the film days? Of course, but it required some out of the box thinking to build the mechanical recorders of the early days of aviation.
Some of the earliest flight data recorders used photographic film rolls that had lines exposed on them by light reflected of sets of mirrors. The mirrors were deflected different amounts according to aircraft parameters resulting in a 'strip chart' on the film. This was easy to develop, but was only a one time use as the film had to be replaced after exposure. The first data recorders just recorded a few simple channels of data and were common only on test flights due to their cost.
Later black boxes, like the one featured in the video below, used metal strips with the data scratched into the metal by a sharp stylus. These records survived the fire and shock much better than film, but were still single use. Keep in mind this is still all done with 'old fashioned' technology as there was no solid state memory in these days. The next step was voice recording. What were the pilots talking about before the crash?
Video on Analog Recorder
In the 1950's spy gadgets were the rage in the intelligence community and they required some of the same properties that aircraft flight data recorder designers desired: compact, durable, simple. Wire recording was the answer. Magnetically encode data on a spool of wire and use a ground based playback/decoding system. It wasn't long before both the flight data and the cockpit voice data were being recorded on the same wire reel. This reel could be erased and used again.
Modern flight data recorders and required to store at least 88 parameters by law (US) and they are solid state. There are a few cases where the data has been unreadable to due destruction of the unit, but new units that propel themselves from the crash may solve that problem. The new recorders also transmit a beacon signal making them easier to find for about a month. Some of the smart units are even capable of observing when inputs are changing rapidly and collecting data more often as this is when things are likely to go wrong.
The purpose of this trip through the history of the flight data recorder was not only to show the evolution of a remarkable and very useful device, but to show how engineering problems can be solved without a microchip. Are the recorders now better than those of the film days? Of course, but it required some out of the box thinking to build the mechanical recorders of the early days of aviation.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Progress on Ultrasonic Mapper
My last post was on the idea, brainstorming, and basic setup of a ultrasonic mapper intended for cave passages. This post is an update on the prototype that is running now and will hopefully be tested relatively soon when a bit more hardware mounting has been done.
Attached are several photos of the current state of the system, a simple plexiglass mount was constructed to attach the servo and sounder to an old tripod. This mount will be stronger on a final version and detachable from the tripod. This is just a proof of concept prototype.

Since servos only rotate 180 degrees the final model will use two sounders opposed to each other to collect a full 360 degree profile. This means a similar connector (5-pin mic style) will be used with two units mounted in one case, or it may be possible to go with a more sophisticated sounder. Keep in mind that the point of the whole project is to construct the profiler on a student shoestring budget.
Below is an 'image' collected. The vertical line on the right side is the back of an office chair and the feature on the left is the back and seat of a couch. This was scanned rather slowly over about 40 seconds with many pings averaged out to reduce error.
Since I collected these images I have implemented an intelligent algorithm that makes a quick three ping assessment and based upon the results it will move to the next position or ping up to an additional fifty times to reduce the uncertainty.
The next step will be to make an intelligent scanning rate method that will scan with lower resolution over smooth surfaces and slow down over surface features. Hopefully the whole scan can be a 15-30 second ordeal allowing quick mapping of passages.
Since servos only rotate 180 degrees the final model will use two sounders opposed to each other to collect a full 360 degree profile. This means a similar connector (5-pin mic style) will be used with two units mounted in one case, or it may be possible to go with a more sophisticated sounder. Keep in mind that the point of the whole project is to construct the profiler on a student shoestring budget.
Below is an 'image' collected. The vertical line on the right side is the back of an office chair and the feature on the left is the back and seat of a couch. This was scanned rather slowly over about 40 seconds with many pings averaged out to reduce error.
Since I collected these images I have implemented an intelligent algorithm that makes a quick three ping assessment and based upon the results it will move to the next position or ping up to an additional fifty times to reduce the uncertainty.
The next step will be to make an intelligent scanning rate method that will scan with lower resolution over smooth surfaces and slow down over surface features. Hopefully the whole scan can be a 15-30 second ordeal allowing quick mapping of passages.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




